x

Welcome

Thank you for coming back, please login below.
Login:
Forgot your password? Click Here Don't have an account? Register Now!
x

Register

Please complete the form below.

Does the Republic of Macedonia have a right to Alexander the great? Join the debate... Options · View
Lautaro
#1 Posted : Friday, August 21, 2009 2:36:17 PM
Rank: Centurian

Groups: Registered

Joined: 8/21/2009
Posts: 33
Points: 98
Location: Malvern, PA
Much has been said of late , of the debate between Greece and the Republic of Macedonia over the patrimony of the Ancient Macedonian Kingdom of Alexander. As a recent report in the economist states:

Quote:
Macedonia remains fragile eight years after it almost lapsed into war. Testy relations with its neighbours do not help. For 18 years it has been locked in conflict with Greece over its name, which the Greeks say implies territorial pretensions to Greek Macedonia. Macedonia has won sympathy from other European countries in this dispute. But under the nationalist Mr Gruevski, it is losing it.

When Macedonia renamed Skopje airport for Alexander the Great in 2007, this seemed a one-off to annoy Greece. More recently, however, the government has broadened a policy the opposition calls “antiquisation”. The main road to Greece has been renamed for Alexander and the national sports stadium named after his father, and plans are afoot to erect a huge statue of Alexander in central Skopje. These gestures play well to a public that was incensed by Greece’s veto of an invitation to Macedonia to join NATO, but the country is losing friends. “It is nuts,” sighs one diplomat. “They don’t see the cause and effect.”

Alexander died in 323BC. The Slavs arrived only a thousand years later. But, says Pasko Kuzman, an archaeologist at the culture ministry, Macedonians are a mix of all the people who have ever lived in the region, so they have every right to treat Alexander as a symbol. Besides, he adds, Greece denies the very existence of a Macedonian minority in Greece.

Macedonia’s ethnic Albanians have mostly stayed out of this debate. Some officials say antiquisation was a sop to offset the shock of not being let into NATO. They dearly want the European Union to grant visa-free travel to Macedonians this year (and then open membership talks). If people in Macedonia and elsewhere in the western Balkans lose hope of ever joining the EU, says Macedonia’s deputy prime minister, Ivica Bocevski, everybody should start worrying about regional stability.


Where do you stand on this debate?
Pulaski's Ghost
#2 Posted : Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:59:01 PM
Rank: Patrician

Groups: Registered

Joined: 8/25/2009
Posts: 17
Points: 51
The Macedonians were neither Greek nor Slavic..but I'm sure traces of both people exist in both countries today. Silly argument..fight for land, not words....
Atilla the Bun
#3 Posted : Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:00:03 PM
Rank: Patrician

Groups: Registered

Joined: 8/23/2009
Posts: 22
Points: 66
Well said Pulaski!!
Dr. Atl
#4 Posted : Monday, September 21, 2009 7:55:35 PM
Rank: Patrician

Groups: Registered

Joined: 9/21/2009
Posts: 10
Points: 33
The ancient Macedonians were neither Greek, nor Slavic, but an extinct or assimilated people which were the ancestors of the the Thracians. They did not speak a language related to Greek, but adopted Greek only after Alexander conquered the entire Greek mainland.

Even today many country have similar myths of origin that can be skeptical at best, including the Italians (think Mussolini), English, French and even the Greeks themselves. In other words the Macedonians are not the only ones guilty of using history to support nationalism.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.